AZAD HAYKAZUNI ARMENIAN NOBILITY MESAPOTAMIA
Isaiah 58:8
The Armenian combination of a vowel and a sonant pronounced as one sound as in a diphthong ‘ay’ or ‘ai’ is the same as the sound made in English by combining the letters ‘a’ phone 'aaa' and ‘i’ phone 'eee' into a glide 'aaee' when sounded out it sounds exactly like sounding out the word ‘eye’. When pronouncing the diphthong /ai/ an open syllable as in the words my, tie, rye, lie, pie, tire, type, mind, idea, spire, find, life, light.
With the collective unconscious breaking forth into the conscious in mind, we can say that the 'inner light' breaking forth like the dawn. Thus the inner light like the light of dawn represents the first thought. This first 'Inner Light' also named Luminous mind (Skt: ābhāsvara-citta, is variously translated as "brightly shining mind", or "mind of clear light" while the related term luminosity is also translated as "clear light" or "luminosity" in Tibetan Buddhist contexts or, 'purity' in East Asian contexts.
'H' in Armenian signifies the breath/spirit and 'AI' the 'inner light' that issues forth from the soul or the 'Luminous mind' that sounds out the spirit , the logos Hai.
This word in and of itself has intrinsic meaning. However, when deconstructed, each individual letter/sound possibly refers to some universal concept found in the system in which the formula appears. Additionally, in grouping certain letters/sounds together one is able to display meaningful sequences that are considered to be of value to the spiritual system that utilizes them (e.g., spiritual hierarchies, historiographic data, or psychological stages). In Hebrew ARARITA (אראריתא) is what is know as a Notariqon, which is essentially an acronym for the Hebrew phrase: "Achad Rosh, Achdotho Rosh, Ichudo Temurato Achad", which means: "One is Thy Beginning; One is Thy Individuality; Thy Permutation is One. Most of these permutative arrangements have their origin in Hermetic Qabalah, many of the formulae listed below can be best understood by using various techniques of Hebrew Kabbalah such as gematria (or isopsephy), temurah, and notariqon to analyze them.
AZ: Looking more deeply into the root 'az' of the word 'azad' as it extends in the Armenian words ազնիւ, adjective Noble, gentle, excellent, fine, good, rare, precious. ազնուական, adjective, noun Noble, genteel, gentle, nobleman. ազնուազարմ adjective High-born, noble, illustrious, of a noble family. ազնուաբար, adverb Nobly, genteelly, civilly, generously. ազնուագոյն, adjective Better, best. ազնուագութ, adjective Tender, good-natured, favourable, clement, benign, humane. ազնուազգութիւն, noun Nobility, gentility, nobility of nation.
The first attested Armenian royal dynasty was the Orontids (Yervandunis) which was ruling Armenia as a satrapy of the Persian Empire in the 4th century BC.
The Armenian interpretation of term nakharar, which is based on internal etymology, from Armenian 'nakh' and 'arar,' nakh translates to pre and arar "first of the first". The meaning of nakharar obviously evolved in time and circumstance, political realities, with consolidation.The Armenian nobility were internally divided.
The sons of the king, i.e. princes, were called sepuh. The elder son, who was also the crown prince and was called avag sepuh, had a particular role. In the case of king's death the avag sepuh automatically would inherit the crown, unless there were other prior arrangements.
The second layer in the social division of the Armenian nobility was occupied by bdeshkhs. The four bdeshkhs were rulers of large borderland provinces of historical Greater Armenia. They were de facto viceroys and by their privileges were very close to the king. Bdeshkhs had their own armies, taxation and duties system, and could even produce their own coins.
The third layer of the Armenian aristocracy after the king and the bdeshkhs was composed by ishkhans, i.e. princes. The term ishkhan derives from ancient Aryan root xshatriya (warrior-ruler). An ishkhan normally would have a hereditary estate known as hayreniq and residence caste - dastakert. Armenian princely houses (or clans) were headed by tanuter. By its meaning the word tun (house) is very close to tohm (clan). Accordingly, tanuter meant "houselord" or "lord of the clan".
Organizationally, the Armenian nobility was headed by the metz ishkhan ("great ishkhan") or ishkhanats ishkhan ("ishkhan of ishkhans") in Armenian, who in some historical chronicles is also called metzametz. He was the marshal of Armenian nobility and had special privileges and duties. For example, in case of the king's death and if there was no inheriting sepuh (crown prince), it was the metz ishkhan who would temporarily take the responsibilities and perform the duties of the king until the issues of succession to the throne are resolved. In reality, however, the successions to the throne would be arranged in advance or would be resolved in the course of feuds and internal struggle.
Thus, the social pyramid of the nobility of Great Armenia includes the following layers:Arka or Tagavor (king)
Bdeshkh (viceroy)
Ishkhanats ishkhan (grand duke)
Ishkhan (prince)
This division, however, reflects the specific tradition of Great Armenia in its early period in history. Naturally, in time the social structure of nobility underwent changes based on the specifics of Armenian territories, historical era, and social relations.
Armenian hereditary rights from day one were patrilinear society .
Hamon states "A rhema is an inspired Word birthed within your own spirit, a whisper from the Holy Spirit like the still, small voice that spoke to Elijah in the cave. It is a divinely inspired impression upon your soul, a flash of thought or a creative idea from God. It is conceived in your spirit, but birthed into your natural understanding by divine illumination. A true rhema carries with it a deep inner assurance and witness of the Spirit." Hamon, expounding on Romans 10:17 and goes on to say that a rhema is "that timely, Holy Spirit-inspired Word from the Logos that brings life, power, and faith to perform and fulfil it...[it] must be received with faith by the hearer in order for it to fulfil its mission."
‘In the beginning was the Word’ (John 1: 1). This first declaration of the Fourth Gospel is I believe the focus of Coleridge's ‘logosophic’ system. He constantly echoed and explored it from the time of his full adoption of a Trinitarian faith in 1805. Coleridge used ‘Word’ (Logos) as a supremely fitting analogy to communicate reality or the Idea of 'god'. Logos is the original archetypal symbolic medium for intelligent communication.
In the New Testament, the phrase "Word (Logos) of God," found in John 1:1 and elsewhere, shows God's desire and ability to "speak" to the human.
Logosophy is the combination of the Greek word "logos" and "sophia", which its author adopted as meaning the manifestation of the supreme knowledge through the intuitive study of the created word or an original science for the persecute of wisdom, respectively, to denote "a new line of cognitions, a doctrine, a method and a technique which are eminently its own"Logosophy argues that the thoughts can be autonomous and independent of one's individual will, and that they are born and fulfill their function under the influence of the moral or psychic states of their owner or someone else. Its purpose is to free the mental faculties of suggestive influences, allowing the human being to think freely and understand the true objectives of life.
Comments