SPEECH SOUNDS PHONE KI KEWH KYROS PROSODY LINGUISTICS SPEECH

Three in Armenian addopts the գ and the word գագաթ doubles the գ as in գգթ the meaning of the word a noun suggests a or the point at theTop of the summit, the head, the pinnacle.

In linguistics, prosody (/ˈprɒsədi, ˈprɒzədi/)^[1][2] is the study of elements of speech that are not individual phonetic segments (vowels and consonants) but which are properties of syllables and larger units of speech, including linguistic functions such as intonation, stress, and rhythm. Such elements are known as suprasegmentals.

Prosody may reflect features of the speaker or the utterance: their emotional state; the form of utterance (statement, question, or command); the presence of irony or sarcasm; emphasis, contrast, and focus. It may reflect elements of language not encoded by grammar or choice of vocabulary.Semantic prosody, also discourse prosody, describes the way in which certain seemingly neutral words can be perceived with positive or negative associations through frequent occurrences with particular collocations. Coined in analogy to linguistic prosody, popularised by Bill Louw.

Paralanguage, also known as vocalics, is a component of meta-communication that may modify meaning, give nuanced meaning, or convey emotion, by using techniques such as prosody, pitch, volume, intonation, etc. It is sometimes defined as relating to nonphonemic properties only. Paralanguage may be expressed consciously or unconsciously.

QUI or KUH or KEWH

The prefix *Ku  of the word κῦρος (kûros,) signifies “supremacy” +‎ -ιος (-ios, adjective suffix), from Proto-Hellenic *kúrios, from Proto-Indo-European *ḱuh₁-ró-s, from *ḱewh₁- (“to swell, spread out, be strong, prevail”). The same root of κυέω (kuéō, “to be pregnant”), κῦμα (kûma, “wave”), Sanskrit शवस् (śavas, “strength, power”) and Irish curadh (“hero”).

Usage notes for *kewh
In the Septuagint, κύριος is regularly used to translate יהוה (a.k.a. the Tetragrammaton).
During the Koine period, the nominative became more regular for direct address (as opposed to just the vocative).
Patristic usage expanded the use of κύριος to address the Holy Spirit as well.

The study and classification of speech sounds requires "a phonetics laboratory"

Phonetics is a branch of linguistics that studies how humans produce and perceive sounds. Linguists who specialize in studying the physical properties of speech are phoneticians. The field of phonetics is traditionally divided into three sub-disciplines based on the research questions involved such as how humans plan and execute movements to produce speech (articulatory phonetics), how various movements affect the properties of the resulting sound (acoustic phonetics), or how humans convert sound waves to linguistic information (auditory phonetics). Traditionally, the minimal linguistic unit of phonetics is the phone—a speech sound in a language which differs from the phonological unit of phoneme; the phoneme is an abstract categorization of phones. Phonetics deals with two aspects of human speech: production—the ways humans make sounds—and perception—the way speech is understood.

The communicative modality of a language describes the method by which a language produces and perceives languages. Languages with oral-aural modalities such as English produce speech orally (using the mouth) and perceive speech aurally (using the ears).
In semiotics, a modality is a particular way in which information is to be encoded for presentation to humans, i.e. to the type of sign and to the status of reality ascribed to or claimed by a sign, text, or genre. It is more closely associated with the semiotics of Charles Peirce (1839–1914) than Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913) because meaning is conceived as an effect of a set of signs. In the Peircean model, a reference is made to an object when the sign (or representamen) is interpreted recursively by another sign (which becomes its interpretant), a conception of meaning that does in fact imply a classification of sign types.

The psychology of perception suggests the existence of a common cognitive system that treats all or most sensory-ly conveyed meanings in the same way. If all signs must also be objects of perception, there is every reason to believe that their modality will determine at least part of their nature. Thus, the sensory modalities will be visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory, kinesthetic, etc. A list of sign types would include: writing, symbol, index, image, map, graph, diagram, etc. Some combinations of signs can be multi-modal, i.e. different types of signs grouped together for effect. But the distinction between a medium and a modality should be clarified.

Modality refers to a certain type of information and/or the representation format in which information is stored. The medium is the means whereby this information is delivered to the senses of the interpreter. Natural language is the primary modality, having many invariant properties across the auditory media as spoken language. When meaning is conveyed by spoken language, it is converted into sound waves broadcast by the speaker and received by another's ears.

There are five main characteristics or properties of sound waves: wavelength, amplitude, frequency, time period, and velocity. The wavelength of a sound wave indicates the distance that wave travels before it repeats itself.

A great place to start my thesis is with the English word 'language' from Middle English langage, language, from Old French language, from Vulgar Latin *linguāticum, from Latin lingua (“tongue, speech, language”), from Old Latin dingua (“tongue”), from Proto-Indo-European *dn̥ǵʰwéh₂s (“tongue, speech, language”).

In English there are approximately 24 consonants and these are arranged into five main groups: (1) plosives, (2) nasals, (3) fricatives, (4) affricates, and (5) approximants. Some consonants are produced using voice (“b”, “d”, “g”, “m”, “n”, “ng”, “th” “v”, “z”, “zh”, “j”, “y”, “w”, “r”, “l”) and the rest are voiceless , muted sounds like (“p”, “t”, “k”, “th”, “f”, “s”, “sh”, “ch”, “h”). Armenian the voiced include the rough "h", very rough "h", and for voiceless we can add the "ts", "dz", ......

Synonyms for unarbitrary include prescribed, set down as a rule or guide, deliberate, logical, not random. Also the word non-arbitrary an adjective is used in place of un-arbitrary by linguists to mean, subjected to individual determination or rational, reasoned, supported, sensible, logical, deliberate, enlightened, intelligent, reflective, reasoning, sound, sensible.

The present study claims that there is a non-arbitrary connection between the minimum linguistic unit, a phone and its meaning. The language I have chosen to demonstrate this is an ancient one that has evolved and survived 5000+ years, from the time of Sumerian civilization.

It is traditionally and still today generally accepted that the association between linguistic sounds and meaning is arbitrary. Some recent studies show that in some cases, participants recognize a non-arbitrary association between linguistic sounds and their meaning, however... 

In the present paper I attempt to show that linguistic sounds and meaning have a sensible relationship. The study will attempt to demonstrate that the connection is logical, deliberate, rational, reasoned, sensible, scientific, consistent.  

In this document arbitrary means that there is no essential relationship between linguistic sounds and their meaning and non-arbitrary means that there is an essential relationship at the fundamental foundational level between linguistic sounds and meaning.

From a historical aspect, Cratylus argued in favor of a non-arbitrary association between linguistic sounds and meaning, thus formulating the naturalism theory.

The interpretation of a biological function is not an intentional communication signal. There is an authority of meaning over mind. In other words, it is specific sound signals that are directly tied to specific, certain meanings. For the vast majority of sounds, signals, symbols, there is no intrinsic or logical connection between a sound form (signal) and what it refers to. 

Almost all names a human language attributes an object are thus arbitrary: the word "car" is nothing like an actual car. Spoken words are really nothing like the objects they represent. The relationship between form and meaning is arbitrary. This principle still generally applies, however the possibility of non-arbitrary form-meaning relationships, in language still exists.

Hockett originally believed there to be 13 design features. While primate communication utilizes the first 9 features, the final 4 features (displacement, productivity, cultural transmission, and duality) are reserved for humans. Hockett later added prevarication, reflexiveness, and learnability to the list as uniquely human characteristics.

Discreteness Linguistic representations can be broken down into small discrete units which combine with each other in rule-governed ways. They are perceived categorically, not continuously.
Displacement Displacement refers to the idea that humans can talk about things that are not physically present or that do not even exist. Speakers can talk about the past and the future, and can express hopes and dreams. A human's speech is not limited to here and now. Displacement is one of the features that separates human language from other forms of primate communication.

Productivity Productivity refers to the idea that language-users can create and understand novel utterances. Humans are able to produce an unlimited amount of utterances. Also related to productivity is the concept of grammatical patterning, which facilitates the use and comprehension of language. Language is not stagnant, but is constantly changing. Ideophone is a word class evoking ideas in sound imitation or onomatopoeia to express action, manner of property (representing the sound of the action taking place. Also named phonosemantic because they indicate not a grammatical word class in the traditional sense of the word (like verb or noun), but rather a lexical class based on the special relationship between form and meaning exhibited by sound or ideophones. Ideophones have sometimes been overlooked or treated as a subgroup of interjections. An example of an early imitating sounds most importantly for an action or movement like “vrooom.”Onomatopoeia on the other hand is the process of creating a word that phonetically imitate, resemble, suggest the sound that it trys to describe. Common onomatopoeias include animal noises such as oink, meow (or miaow), roar, and chirp. Train- “choo-choo” (Push train)Car- “beep-beep” (Drive car). Fire truck- “whoo-woo” (Drive truck).Boat- “puh-puh-puh” (Wave boat). Truck- “honk-honk” (Drive truck). Clock- “tick-tock” (Rock head back and fourth). Phone- “ring-ring” (Hold phone to ear). Vacuum- “brrrrrrmm” (Pretend to push vacuum).Popcorn- “pop-pop-pop” (Pop fingers up),Bubbles- “pop-pop-pop” (Popping bubbles). Baby- “waaah” (Tap baby).Sneezing- “achooo” (Place hand over face and mouth). Hiding- “peek-a-boo” (Cover face). Cow- “moo”. Dog- “ruff ruff”.Duck- “quack quack”. Echotations is a party game where players compete with each other to see who can come the closest to imitate sounds. This demonstrates how much the attempt to imitate a sound can differ from one to another. 

Onomatopoeia can differ between languages: it conforms to some extent to the broader linguistic system; hence the sound of a clock may be expressed as tick tock in English, tic tac in Spanish and Italian (shown in the picture), dī dā in Mandarin, kachi kachi in Japanese, or tik-tik in Hindi. That said imitating sounds made by one human are easily imitated by another, even by a one year old. 

Babies love sounds because they are simpler for their little mouths to say the first 12 months of life. Most sounds have a repetitious consonant-vowel structure with elongated vowels, that makes imitation easy. As a baby starts babbling, we notice that it becomes much easier to imitate sounds, rather than words. Using more diverse sounds during play and communication can set a great stage for future word learning.

Traditional transmission Also known as cultural transmission, traditional transmission is the idea that, while humans are born with innate language capabilities, language is learned after birth in a social setting. It differs critically from Chomsky's idea of Universal Grammar but rather purports that people learn how to speak by interacting with experienced language users. Significantly, language and culture are woven together in this construct, functioning hand in hand for language acquisition.

Duality of patterning Meaningful messages are made up of distinct smaller meaningful units (words and morphemes) which themselves are made up of distinct smaller, meaningless units (phonemes).

Reflexiveness Humans can use language to talk about language. Also a very defining feature of human language, reflexiveness is a trait not shared by animal communication. With reflexiveness, humans can describe what language is, talk about the structure of language, and discuss the idea of language with others using language.

Learnability Language is teachable and learnable. In the same way, as a speaker learns their first language, the speaker is able to learn other languages. It is worth noting that young children learn language with competence and ease; however, language acquisition is constrained by a critical period such that it becomes more difficult once children pass a certain age.The best place to start my thesis is with the English word language which is traced through Middle English langage, language, from Old French language, from Vulgar Latin *linguāticum, from Latin lingua (“tongue, speech, language”), from Old Latin dingua (“tongue”), from Proto-Indo-European *dn̥ǵʰwéh₂s (“tongue, speech, language”) ...... to cont.

The following are names in Armenian of 'body parts' Մարմնի մասեր (Marmni maser).
body, substance, մարմին, (marmin) մարմնաբար, adverb Corporally, bodily. mart, marz.....to cont.

Qui and que:  When Moses asked god 'who' are you? God said I am 'that' I am. 

However, either word can mean “who” or “that”. In fact, qui and que don’t translate directly to any one English word.

To the 'question/Qui' of what or who created all, we can go to the author or composer of any of the biblical Psalms who say that the answer is God. So from them, their god is the answer to your question. God is the one who loves, who saves, and who helps one and all. 

On this side of redemptive history, Jesus his son is the answer to the question of “Who?” He is the answer to the deepest questions and or longings of our heart. So as Christians we postulate on Christ his father God.

The concept of God is a postulate, it is needed by the brain attempting to focus the wondering mind to make sense of the life and death, suffering and loss, the world we are born into live and die in. If you start wondering why you are here, why do these things happen in my life, what is the purpose of all, why and how long will I suffer, who or what is responsible for the creation, invariably at some point the mind will come up with a personalised god for once ones parents place us in our room and turn off the light and shut the door, we realize we are alone and we are shit scared. The best we are offered as a salvation to comfort us in our fear and deeply expressed sorrow is a 'teddy bear' for we are to young to be introduced to god. To make things worse it is not seen as sane to be talking out loud to one-self or ones teddy.

That said depending on your culture, your mind will latch onto one of many available concepts of a unity, for one to postulate on.

To clarify we can say that qui and que, who or what are a relative pronouns which are words that don’t have one absolute meaning. Some words, like 'life or love' have a meaning, and can be defined in the dictionary and or drawn in a picture. Relative pronouns can’t be explained for they stand in for another word, so their meaning is based on their context in a sentence. They are words that connect two sentences and refer to something mentioned previously in a sentence, like “which” or “that” in English. At the beginning of a question, qui usually means “who” and que typically means “what”. This is what French learners typically think each word means.

We use qui to replace the subject or indirect object* of a sentence. We use que to replace the direct object.

The Armenian signifier for the word ‘nose’, քիթ (kʿitʿ) is still obscure. It is presumed that it has no Indo-European origin. Body-part names in Armenian do not appear borrowed. They present predominantly genuine (or substrate) forms, including ideophones, based on internal resources of the language, or terms, shaped through semantic shift of metaphors. The origin of thousands of Armenian words is still considered unknown, a mystery.

First my intention is to show that քիթ (kʿitʿ) is  native to Armenian, possibly from a Caucasian substrata and if I succeed then I will venture on to other body part names in Armenian for the methodology used to give meaning to 'kit' will throw light on the origins of the others. 

This paper attempts to show that I have traced the possible background of քիթ (kʿitʿ).

Let me start with the most common character for phone qi in is this 氣. It is made up of two parts or pictograms. 气 which represents air, and 米 which represents rice. So the combined character 氣 represents the steam coming off rice. It is used in many common Japanese idiomatic phrases where it conveys a meaning of spirit, energy, power, or air (gaseous). 

From middle Armenian we have կիւռ (kiwṙ), կիռ (kiṙ) which is a colourless volatile flammable liquid which is produced by the natural fermentation of sugars and is the intoxicating constituent of wine, beer, spirits, and other drinks, and is today used as an industrial solvent and as fuel. It is in the cotemporary language of chemistry, any organic compound whose molecule contains one or more hydroxyl groups attached to a carbon atom.

Qi, or ki in Japanese, is explained as a vital force and according to Chinese culture that forms part of any living thing. (A living thing one can define as a moving thing, thus evoking the Greek Kinisis) A living thing can be said to have energy, which can be said to be a 'life force', a 'vital force'. 

 Qi is the central underlying principle in Chinese traditional medicine and in Chinese martial arts. The practice of cultivating and balancing qi is called qigong.  Qi describe by believers as a vital force, are pseudoscientific, it is unrelated to the concept of energy we use in science. Vital energy is an abandoned scientific notion. The historian of medicine in China Paul U. Unschuld puts things right when he writes that there "is no evidence of a concept of 'energy' – either in the strictly physical sense or even in the more colloquial sense – anywhere in Chinese medical theory." The most common character for qi is this 氣. It is made up of two parts or pictograms. 气 which represents air, and 米 which represents rice. So the combined character 氣 represents the steam coming off rice.

Cuneiform ki is used for syllabic "ki", and also for alphabetic "k", and alphabetic i. It has additional consonant usage for "q", instead of "k", and also "e", "é", and "í" for vowel "i". Its usage numbers from the Epic of Gilgamesh are as follows: ke-(9), ki-(291), qé-(18), qí-(62), and KI-(288). 

According to legends, heaven and earth were once inseparable until Enlil was born; Enlil cleaved heaven and earth in two. An carried away heaven. Ki, in company with Enlil, took the earth. Ki marries her son, Enlil, and from this union all the plant and animal life on earth is produced.

In some legends Ki and An were brother and sister, being the offspring of An-shar ("Sky Pivot") and Ki-shar ("Earth Pivot"), earlier personifications of heaven and earth.

Some authorities question whether Ki was regarded as a deity since there is no evidence of a cult and the name appears only in a limited number of Sumerian creation texts.

*ḱi- is said to be a particle in Proto-Indo-European and that it is/was indeclinable with some 'daughter' languages, particularly Balto-Slavic, Germanic and Armenian where it was added as a pronominal inflection. 

I think this is not correct for if a particle is a word that has only a grammatical function but does not fit into the main parts of speechat least in Armenian (a daughter language) *ki does play a central part in the structured formation of *key (please excuse the pun) words, not only in Armenian but many comparative PIE languages. 

The English *Che of the word Chemistry, which has come from the Greek word χημεία (khēmeia) phoneme *khe which is said to mean"cast together" or "pour together".The word is said to have derived from the Arabian phrase "al-kimia," which refers to the preparation of the Stone or Elixir by the Egyptians. This is probably because it is the science of matter at the atomic to molecular scale, dealing primarily with collections of atoms, such as molecules, crystals, and metals, is not a correct interpretation or etymology.
This begs the question, what the prefix or phoneme *ki or the syllable *kim signify since neither the English transliteration of the phoneme *ki *che nor the Greek *khe nor the Egyptian *ki can claim the history of, or the formation of the word and, by extension, the origin and evolution of its semantic meaning across time. Nobody has satisfactorily shown origination of the word by breaking it down to its elements, something I believe I have done to show the root sense of the word.
That said I believe that Armenian, a proto Indo-European language, can help us with a clearer understanding of the etymology of the root phoneme *ki and its derivatives. I believe I can show beyond a shadow of doubt that the origin and root meaning of the phoneme *ki, signifies 'essence' the unseen finite particle in air, sensed by or detected by the human nose and palate. This I offer as fact for the word for nose in Armenian is *kit and the word for palate is *kimk, the god given sense organs for detecting and differentiating essences in life. This suggests that the phoneme *ki is a designed or constructed nonarbitrary syllable with a specified meaning. This demonstrates that the all derivatives of *ki, in Indo-European like the Armenian words for nose/kit and palate/kimk were empirical, in other words based on,  verifiable observation or experience not only theory or pure logic. հիւթ (hiut) in Armenian is the noun for essence, as well as juice, mucus and humor.

I hope I have provided enough empirical evidence to support my argument that at least the Armenian language that claims to have been spoken at least 4500 years ago in Sumer and the Caucasus's was/is at root a structured, non-arbitrary, possibly an inspired aa priory language.(“involving reasoning from cause to effect; from first principles”)

It is said that Alchemists attempted to purify, mature, and perfect certain gross materials. Besides the transmutation of "base metals" into "noble metals" (particularly gold); They were also the creators of medicines, the creation of panaceas with claims to cure any disease. They were involved in the creation of an elixir of immortality, which aimed for the perfection of the human body and the soul, an aim they named the alchemical magnum opus ("Great Work"). The concept of creating the philosophers' stone was variously connected with all of these projects. Non of these aims would have had a hope in hell of succeeding if the Alchemist did not have a nose or palate for it.

Derivatives of root phoneme *ki;

nose, քիթ, (kit) Լրտես a spy as in smelling out the secrets of what lies beneath the chemical secret of something. The nose and palate define the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of something, something real and abstract, which determines its character. In the physical world the nose and palate define and give meaning to an extract or concentrate obtained from a plant, animal or all matter for flavouring or scent as in "vanilla essence.""Vanilla has no taste at all. It's a smell, and the pleasant sensation is coming not from your mouth but from the nose, through the passage way between the back of the mouth and the back of the nose."

Smell is the most chemical of all the senses, intimately rooted in our memories.

If *ki or *qi is borrowed from Mandarin and it signified 'essence' to the word-smith of Armenian, then the word for nose քիթ, (kit) and palate, քիմք (kimk) make sense. However the opposite also makes sense, which is the assumption that the origin of *ki/*qi which gave meaning the words Alchemy and Chemistry was native, Caucasian/Armenia. 

Synonyms for essence, (Ki) are quintessence, quiddity, extract, concentrate, distillate, elixir, soul, spirit, ethos, nature, life, lifeblood, core, heart, centre, crux, nub, nucleus, gist, substance, principle, central part, fundamental quality, basic quality, essential part, intrinsic nature, sum and substance, reality, actuality, esse, nitty-gritty.

eye, ական, ակն, (agn) a genitive noun (eye, gem, jewel, pearl, oval shaped cameo;) eye, աչք, (achk) fount, spring, source, origin. Oculist ակն-աբույժ, Latin oculus "an eye" (from PIE root *okw- "to see"). The hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit akshi "the eye; the number two," Greek osse "(two) eyes," opsis "a sight;" Old Church Slavonic oko, Lithuanian akis, Latin oculus, Greek okkos, Tocharian ak, ek, Armenian akn "eye." ogle; eye for an eye = ակն ընդ ական.

eyebrow, յօնք (honk)
eyelash, թարթիչ (tartich)

ear, ականչ, (aganch), to call, կանչ, noun cry, scream. as verb neutre to name, to sing, to chant. կաբոս, noun Place of deposit, receptacle. անսալ, verb active To hear, to listen, to obey.
tongue, լեզու (lezu)

head, գլուխ (klukh)
arm, բազուկ (pazug). թեւ, (tev) noun arm, wing. աջ թեւ, right flank.,ձախ թեւ, left flank.

elbow, forearm, արմուկ,(armoog) արմուկն, noun, forearm. կն կն կն in eye and ear?
hand, ձեռք (tseṛkʿ)

leg,  ոտք (vodkʿ)
knee, ծունկ (dzung)
foot, ոտք (odkʿ)
belly, որովայն (orovayn)

tummy, փոր (por)

waist, մէջք (mechk)

shoulder, ուս (oos)

neck, վիզ (viz)
neck, պարանոց (baranotsʿ)
bottom, հետույք (heduykʿ)

back, կռնակ (gernag)
finger, մատ (mad)
toe, ոտնամատ (odnamad)
body, մարմին (marmin)

face, դեմք / երես (temk / yeres)
mouth, բերան (peran)

palate,taste, քիմք (kimk)

lap, bosom, arm, գիրկ (kirg) = fathom
tooth, ատամ (atam/agra) = first man

teeth, ատամներ (atamner)

cheek, այտ (ayd)
chin, կզակ (gezag)
jaw, ծնոտ (dzenod)
little finger, ճկոյթ (djeguyt) 
nail, եղունգ (yeghunk) 
thigh, ազդր (azter) 

forehead, ճակատ (djagad)
lip, շրթունք (shertunk)
beard, մորուք (moruk)
skin, մորթ (mort)
throat, կոկորդ (gogort)
heart, սիրտ (sird)
thumb, բթամատ (petamud)
index-finger, ցուցամատ (tsutsamad)
middle-finger, միջնամատ (michnemad)
ring-finger,մատնեմատ (madnemad)
little-finger,ճկոյթ (djeguyt)

nail, եղունգ (yeghunk)

bald-headed, կնտակ (gndug)

Thumb forefinger space, քիլ (kil) = The thumb represents GOD and the index finger represents the Atma or will of man to transcend the Universe ! Join both and you have become for a short time the Transcendent one ! This Mudra is a means of seeking Union with God!

Natural language or ordinary language is that which evolves naturally in humans through localised use, by simple repetition, without conscious planning or premeditation. The development of or the evolution of a natural language when analysed appears to owe its survival to the fact that young children learn language with competence and ease though its acquisition is constrained to a critical period, (estimates ranging between 2 and 13 years of age) it simply becomes more difficult after a certain age to acquire for language acquisition relies on neuroplasticity

On the other hand when the general concept of "language" refers to the cognitive ability to learn and use systems of complex communication, or to describe the set of rules that makes up these systems, or the set of utterances that can be produced from those rules. It is a structured system of communication that consists of grammar and vocabulary. It is the primary means by which humans convey meaning, first in spoken then in written forms and also through gestures.

All languages rely on the process of semiosis to relate signs/sounds to particular meanings. Oral, manual and tactile languages contain a phonological system that governs how symbols are used to form sequences known as words or morphemes, and a syntactic system that governs how words are formed and morphemes are combined to form phrases and utterances.

Babbling is a stage in child development and a state in language acquisition during which an infant appears to be experimenting with uttering articulate sounds, but does not yet produce any recognizable words. Babbling begins shortly after birth and progresses through several stages as the infant's repertoire of sounds expands and vocalizations become more speech-like. Infants typically begin to produce recognizable words when they are around 12 months of age,

Babbles are separated from language because they do not convey meaning or refer to anything specific like words do. Babbling can be seen as a precursor to language development or simply as vocal experimentation. Infants typically begin to produce recognizable words when they are around 12 months of age.

The first stimuli of any vocabulary appears at origin to be related to the interpretation of a sound related to a biological function. Even though strictly speaking this is not an intentional communication on the part of the child, once the mother imitates the involuntary sound it becomes ta signal, the first of the speech sounds, the beginning. 

The beginning of direct audio signal, the echo like the reflective mirror of awareness. This is the 'first day' the child discovers that s/he can communicate with sound, learns pronunciation, prosody, syllable stress, timing and articulatory setting very early on. The realization of how to mimic sound by imitation and the development of a spectrum of sounds the human can make to express, for starters feelings/emotions actions gestures and movement  as well as belong to what I call the sub-strata on which all future layers of vocabulary will be based or placed. At this stage the emotional link between the emotional learner and teacher (e.g. parent, spouse), through rewarded and imitation bring pleasant feelings which function as positive reinforcement thus creating the foundation necessary to teach and learn the structured system of communication that consists of grammar and vocabulary. 

Languages may even develop spontaneously in environments where people live or grow up together without a common language, this view, can be traced back to the philosophers Kant and Descartes who understand language to be largely innate.

Examples of localised natural words common in most natural language users, which are created by simple repetition, without conscious planning or premeditation and shared globally are many.The sound for happy, “mmmmm” expressed originally at meal time, also  “yuck, blah”  discovered just when spitting it out, or sticking out tongue.  The reaction to a bad smell  “peeu” and a parents reaction to trouble always “oh-oh”. A burp, also a belch when the baby expel s gas noisily from the stomach through the mouth after being fed. A cough pushing air from the lungs in a quick, noisy explosion, first flew, a cold. Hum a sound from the vocal chords without pronouncing any real words, with one's lips closed first heard when child is humming happily along with the music. A hiccup, the involuntary sound resulting from a spasm of the diaphragm. The groan, a low, mournful sound uttered in pain or grief or uttered in frustration or disapprove. A giggle, in at a high-pitched voice in a silly or giddy way. To laugh express mirth, satisfaction, or derision, by peculiar movement of the muscles of the mouth, usually accompanied by the emission of explosive or chuckling sounds from the chest and throat. To pant, a quick breathing; a catching of the breath; a gasp. Puff, a sharp exhalation of a small amount of breath through the mouth. A scream, the loud, emphatic, exclamation of extreme emotion, usually horror, fear, excitement. Sniff the audible inhalation, through the nose, as if to smell something. The sneeze, expelling air as a reflex induced by an irritation in the nose. Snore, snorting noises when breathing, caused by vibration of the soft palate. A sigh a deep and prolonged audible inspiration or respiration of air, as when fatigued, frustrated, grieved, or relieved. Slurp, a loud sucking noise made in eating or drinking. Yawn a wide open  mouth taking a long deep breath, often because one is tired or bored. Whisper is the act of speaking in a quiet voice.before we get to pre-frontal synthesis or idioms the group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g. over the moon, see the light ) created all the time, where the meaning of signals can vary depending on the context and situation. 

Stage two after learning volume and pitch variation s/he will graduate to the next strata, this strata defines or  sees language as a formal system of signs governed by rules, rules of combination for the formation of words and grammatical rules of combination to communicate meaning. This definition stresses that human languages can be described as closed structural systems consisting of rules that relate particular sounds and signs to particular meanings. This structuralist view of language was first introduced by Ferdinand de Saussure. 

This structuralism remains foundational for many approaches to language. I consider myself a proponent of Saussure's for I have gone in depth into the Armenian language with a formal approach which studying the structure at the level of identifying its basic elements rules according to which the elements combine in order to form words.

Qui, from Latin is who in English and ով, (ov) in Armenian. Also որ (or) for which, who, what, whom. 

The Armenian word Հայց a noun means request, suit, inquiry. postulate.

The word postulate in English also functions as a noun when referring to something that's been postulated, as in “a theory based on disputed postulates.” A thing suggested or assumed as true as the basis for reasoning, discussion, or belief. Like for example

"perhaps the postulate of Babylonian influence on Greek astronomy is incorrect"

Both verb and noun have their source in Latin postulare, meaning "to assume."

In Armenian հայցել, (haytsel,) is the verb active, to request, to beg, to entreat, to demand, to implore, to wish, to solicit, to postulate 

To Postulate is to suggest or assume the existence, fact, or truth of (something) as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or belief. 

Postulate in ecclesiastical law is to nominate or elect (someone) to an ecclesiastical office subject to the sanction of a higher authority. 
"perhaps the postulate of Babylonian influence on Greek astronomy is incorrect"
հայցուած, noun  request, entreaty, petition, solicitation, prayer.